5.5.1 The “square banjo” model

In order to have a model for banjo synthesis with full control over the model parameters, a very simple model has been developed based on results for a rectangular membrane. It might seem odd to use the rectangular shape, when we have relatively easy expressions for the mode shapes and natural frequencies of a more realistic circular membrane (see section 3.6.1). However, it turns out that a model giving realistic sound needs to pay careful attention to damping, including the damping of the membrane due to sound radiation. There are no simple expressions for radiation damping of a circular membrane, but Leppington et al. [1] have provided simple formulae for the rectangular case. These approximate expressions were calculated by an asymptotic method, but they give sufficiently accurate results for this application.

The datum membrane is chosen to have the same area, tension and mass per unit area as the head of the Deering banjo. Specifically, it has tension 5.33 kN/m, mass per unit area 308 g/m$^2$, and dimensions $249 \times 226$ mm in the directions normal and parallel to the strings, respectively. An allowance is made for the added mass resulting from the air in contact with the membrane, using the result for an infinite membrane (see section ?).

Radiation damping of the membrane is modelled using the formulae of Leppington et al. [1], as explained above. These formulae apply to the case of a baffled membrane, which is not physically accurate for a banjo. However, comparisons of admittance computed from the model with the measured admittance of the real banjo gives reasonably good agreement. A constant “background structural damping” with loss factor $4 \times 10^{-3}$ is added to suppress unrealistically high modal Q-factors. A final detail concerning damping of this datum case will be discussed in section 5.5.2.

The “bridge” is modelled as a concentrated mass of 1.5 g, with a footprint $10 \times 10$ mm centred at position (105,80) in mm relative to a corner of the rectangle. An additional stiffness 20 kN/m is applied to the bridge to represent the effect of the axial stiffness of the strings, acting through the break angle over the bridge. Finally, a “dashpot” (mechanical resistance) with impedance 1 Ns/m is added, to increase the damping of the strongest resonances to a level comparable with the measurements. Reference [2] gives a detailed discussion of the effect of these successive additions, and of the choice of parameter values.

[1] Leppington

[2] Whichever banjo paper has the relevant plot. Or do I add that discussion in here somewhere?